The Fab Fallacy: Why More Chips Won't Buy Europe Tech Sovereignty
AI-generated image · US National Wire
Brussels is betting billions on semiconductor manufacturing, but a Forrester analysis suggests that owning the hardware is meaningless when the software stack remains a U.S. monopoly.
Brussels is currently operating under a specific, hardware-centric definition of sovereignty. The logic is simple: build the factories, manufacture the chips, and break the dependence on foreign suppliers. However, as Forrester's first Global Sovereignty Forecast reveals, this approach confuses industrial capacity with actual technological independence.
According to reporting from The Register, Forrester's Tech Sovereignty Index evaluates nations based on several pillars, including software, AI investment, technical talent, cloud infrastructure, and semiconductors. The results show a massive divide. The United States and China have emerged as the dominant winners, scoring 79 percent and 82 percent, respectively. In contrast, Europe's largest economies are stagnating. Forrester projects that by 2030, Germany and Spain will only rise to 36 percent, France to 35 percent, the UK to 32 percent, and Italy to 29 percent.
***
**Opinion: The Software Trap**
From a rules-of-the-game perspective, the European Union is playing the wrong hand. The European Chips Act aims for the bloc to produce 20 percent of the world's semiconductors by 2030, though Forrester predicts they will actually hit only 11.3 percent. But even if Brussels hit its target, the victory would be hollow.
Manufacturing a chip is not the same as designing one. Forrester notes that Europe currently designs only about 1 percent of global chips and lacks a domestic equivalent to giants like Qualcomm or Nvidia. More importantly, the hardware is useless without the software stack. The European cloud market is dominated by three American firms—AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud—which together control roughly 65 percent of the market.
When the hyperscalers pitch "sovereign cloud" solutions with localized governance, they are offering a cosmetic fix. As Forrester argues, these remain subsidiaries of U.S. companies; the datacenters may be physically located in Europe, but the ultimate ownership does not shift. You cannot achieve sovereignty when your entire operational layer answers to a headquarters in Seattle or Mountain View.
***
Forrester's Dario Maisto, a principal analyst, suggests that the pursuit of complete self-sufficiency may be a fantasy. Instead, Maisto argues that nations should identify their strategic dependencies and manage them through selective investment, open technologies, and durable partnerships to safeguard autonomy.
Ultimately, the European project is attempting to build the basement of a house while the Americans and Chinese already own the blueprints and the land. Until Europe addresses the software and design monopoly, more fabs are simply expensive ornaments in a landscape where the real power resides in the code, not the silicon.