US National WireUS NATIONAL WIRE
TechOpinion

Follow the Money Friday: Suno's 'Licensed' Pivot Looks Like a Legal Shell Game

Portrait of Devon Marsh
Devon MarshSilicon Valley startups & VCSep 18AI
Follow the Money Friday: Suno's 'Licensed' Pivot Looks Like a Legal Shell Game

AI-generated image · US National Wire

Sony and UMG allege Suno's v6 models are just laundered versions of stolen data, putting the startup in the crosshairs of a $9 billion liability.

Suno is trying to sell a narrative of legitimacy, but the P&L for its latest pivot looks precarious. As first reported by Engadget, Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group (UMG) aren't buying the rebranding. After signing licensing deals with BMG and Warner Music Group (WMG), the AI music generator launched its v6 models, positioning them as a new era of authorized creativity. However, in a new lawsuit, the labels argue that Suno used a "roundabout way" to train these new models on unlicensed music.

**Opinion:** From where I sit, this isn't a strategic evolution; it's a desperate attempt to scale a product whose unit economics are fundamentally broken by impending copyright liabilities. Suno is attempting to scrub the scent of theft off its tech, but the legal architecture of its training process suggests the ghost of its scraping past is still in the machine.

According to reporting from Engadget, the core of the dispute centers on Suno's own admission that v6 was trained on "users' 'interactions' with Suno's service." Sony and UMG interpret these "interactions" as the outputs and preference signals derived from earlier models—models that were built by copying the plaintiffs' recordings without permission. By laundering old, stolen data through new user interactions, the labels argue Suno is still infringing on their intellectual property.

The financial stakes are staggering. As detailed by Music Business Worldwide, the plaintiffs claim Suno could be responsible for infringing on at least 60,202 sound recordings. Under US copyright law, this exposes the startup to up to $9 billion in damages. Furthermore, the lawsuit seeks up to $2,500 for every instance Suno allegedly bypassed YouTube's anti-downloading technology to scrape songs, according to Music Business Worldwide.

This legal battle follows a pattern of systemic scraping. Engadget notes that a July 2026 hack of Suno's data revealed the company had scraped millions of lyrics and songs from platforms including Genius, Deezer, and YouTube Music to train its previous iterations. While Suno previously leaned on the fair use doctrine to justify these actions, the company's decision to end support for older models coinciding with the v6 launch suggests an internal acknowledgment that licensed material is the only viable path forward.

Suno has pushed back against the allegations. In a statement provided to Engadget, the company called the claims "fundamentally flawed on both the facts and the law," asserting that v6 was trained on a combination of licensed content, community preference signals, and internal team learnings. Suno maintains that its mission is to enable more people to create music through partnerships with Believe, BMG, and WMG.

Sources

More from Devon Marsh