Beaming Power to the Clouds While the Ground Stays Dark

AI-generated image · US National Wire
The UK government is sinking £70 million into 'pseudo-satellites' and laser-powered aircraft, but for the average consumer, these stratospheric fantasies do nothing to fix the basic failure of terrestrial connectivity.
Let's be clear: the UK government is currently obsessed with the stratosphere. While millions of citizens are still fighting for a reliable signal in their own living rooms, the state is betting big on the idea that the answer to connectivity is not better cables in the ground, but high-flying aircraft powered by lasers.
As first reported by The Register, the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA)—a body sponsored by the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade (BIST)—is pouring £70 million into a program called Enduring Atmospheric Platforms. The goal is to develop high-altitude pseudo-satellites (HAPS) that can act as an alternative to orbital satellites to reach underserved communities.
On paper, it sounds like a sci-fi fever dream. ARIA is backing 18 different projects over the next three and a half years to see if an aircraft can hold a station above the UK and supply 300 W of power to a communications payload for a single week. To achieve this, they aren't just looking at better batteries; they are looking at 'power beaming' from the ground up.
As The Register reports, the technical ambitions are staggering. Scalable Laser Ltd is working on laser-based power beaming using high-power laser diodes and photovoltaic receivers. Meanwhile, Space Solar Engineering Ltd is pursuing radio frequency power beaming. If that isn't exotic enough, the University of Bath is developing a project called Stratospheric Navigation and Gravity (STRAT-NAV) to help aircraft ride atmospheric gravity waves—ripples in the air caused by hills or weather fronts—to extend their endurance.
Then there are the aircraft themselves. Menapia, an aerospace startup, is pitching 'Carousel,' a constellation of multi-rotor aircraft designed to create a persistent 'canopy' over the UK at altitudes of up to 20 km. VFP Aerospace is developing 'Enduring Drone Networks,' utilizing a relay system of units that cycle between the ground and the stratosphere for recharging, with a target production cost of £50,000 per drone. To power these things, Hypanode Ltd is attempting to build a fuel cell system that delivers 20 times the energy of current batteries.
From a technical standpoint, Rico Chandra, ARIA's program director for Enduring Atmospheric Platforms, views this as a way to ensure the UK becomes the global hub where this industry is scaled, advocating for 'bold ideas' that include aircraft with spinning wings.
But here is the reality for the consumer: we are talking about 'pseudo-satellites' and laser beams while the actual, terrestrial networks we pay for every month continue to underperform. The ARIA agency—which The Register notes was controversially spared from savings cuts leading up to last year's government Spending Review—is funding a future that exists 12 miles in the air.
It is the classic carrier playbook: ignore the crumbling, basic infrastructure that the public relies on today in favor of a flashy, futuristic project that might—maybe—work in a few years. The government argues that satellites have physical limits and that HAPS are the solution for 'underserved' areas. But the 'underserved' aren't asking for laser-powered drones; they are asking for a connection that doesn't drop when they walk into another room.
When the state spends £70 million on the hope that a drone can stay aloft for seven days, it is a signal of misplaced priorities. We are being sold a vision of a high-tech canopy over the UK, but for the person paying a monthly connectivity bill today, the view from the ground remains the same: unreliable, overpriced, and fundamentally broken.
***
*Opinion: I am a consumer advocate. I have no financial conflicts regarding the companies mentioned in this piece and offer no financial advice.*

