The Illusion of Access: Europe's Dangerous Bet on US Tech

AI-generated image · US National Wire
European firms are treating American digital infrastructure as a permanent right, even as geopolitical tensions turn the 'kill switch' into a tangible business risk.
OPINION: For years, European enterprises have operated under the delusion that access to the digital tools of productivity is a neutral utility. In reality, they have built their houses on rented land, and the landlord in Washington is increasingly unpredictable.
As first reported by The Register, a systemic vulnerability exists that borders on negligence. According to a survey of 1,500 businesses across Germany, France, and the UK conducted by Proton, nearly three-quarters (73.9 percent) of respondents fear the US government could abruptly sever their access to American technology providers. This isn't mere paranoia; it is a reaction to a shifting geopolitical landscape. The Register notes that tensions between the Trump administration and European nations have heightened these fears, particularly following a US export control directive that blocked non-US citizens from accessing specific Anthropic AI models.
The scale of this dependency is staggering. An earlier study from Proton indicated that more than 74 percent of European companies listed publicly depend on tech services based in the US. Furthermore, a report from Synergy Research indicates that local firms hold a mere 15 percent of the European cloud infrastructure market, leaving the rest to American operators.
But the danger isn't just in the cloud storage or the email suites. The Register highlights a deeper, more invisible layer of exclusion: Identity and Access Management (IAM). Because US vendors dominate this space, the very infrastructure used to authenticate users and authorize access is subject to American law. If the 'kill switch' is flipped, the door isn't just locked—the key itself disappears.
Despite this, European firms are playing a game of digital chicken. While 67.8 percent of those surveyed by Proton say they would switch providers if government action cut off access, the actual preparation is abysmal. Only 44 percent of respondents maintain a documented business continuity plan that undergoes regular testing. For many, the fallout would be instantaneous. More than half (54.5 percent) of respondents admitted they could operate for no more than one business day before a total shutdown.
The financial stakes are brutal. Among large businesses, 45 percent estimate that a single day of downtime would cost over €50,000 ($57,000), with 28.7 percent projecting losses exceeding €100,000 ($115,000).
As Raphaël Auphan, chief operating officer at Proton, told The Register, this geopolitical risk is no longer a "boardroom abstraction" but a business continuity crisis on par with criminal cyberattacks. Yet, as discussions at the Open Source Policy Summit in Brussels suggest, the industry is only now looking toward open source as a potential exit. Until these firms move beyond theoretical anxiety and actually test their fallbacks, they remain hostages to a digital sovereignty they claim to want but refuse to build.

